Russia is more advance in missile tech.

Su-30KI (not MKI) vs F-15C was 3 to 1 so there was 9 to 1 score. But surelly Su-30 is better than F-15, F-16 and F-18.

http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard/archive/276111.shtml

India not allowed USAF to see MKI variant.
You believe all what are written in all forums from Internet?
I want to see official declaration about involvement af Su-30MKI in India Cope 2004.

So, R-77E has a range greater than 31miles - about 160Km has R-77M variant, and earlier R-77 has 90Km, far greater than your 31miles.
R-77M has up to 160Km!
R-73 (first variant) has 30Km range.
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/r73.htm
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/r77.htm

AMARAAM has only 50-70 km (30-45 miles) range.
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/amraam.htm
AIM-9 has 18 km (9.7 nm) range
AIM-9x (prototype) has like R-73 later variant 40Km range (but R-73 is in production from 90' and AIM-9X will be maybe after 5 years or earlier).
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/sidinder.htm

So, I want to be honest in this forum. Some of us no more write on this forum because your fanatism and because you are not fair (some of you, not all). If you post an information you must have your source.

About F-22, I read at once (I don't remember where) F-22 has 2D TVC but has less agility than SU with TVC. Overall russians are more advanced in TVC tech than any other country.

What does Su-30/35/37 only X-31 does. NASA try with F-15 with canards and TVC but but are only at the begining.
I believe what said one russian pilot - Su-37 can recover from almost any altitude with any speed. Su-37 has not any AOA limit due to its TVC and canards.
I saw some video with su from www.patricksaviation.com - you must see!
I have a movie where Su-30 do a turn with 180 degree (fly ahead with tail) and then recovered without lose altitude.
In one of my seen movie a SU-37 do 360degreeX2 in about 2-3 seconds. Maybe that movie is from patrick's site (I don't remember exacly).
I saw at TV cobra made by F-22. It was to slowly, and was slowly because of F-22 capability not because pilot want it.

F-22 is closely in maneuvering to SU-30/35/37 but SU are better.

F-22 has a greater advance - its radar - AGP-77. But can carry missiles with max range at about 100Km. Radar can detect large target from about 460Km - that data are from US.

Remember MiG-31BM with Zaslon can detect large target from almost 400Km but MiG-31BM are in service from some years unlike F-22. MiG-31 has R-33/R-37 with range in ideal condition about 185Km.
Think about N014 radar - from MiG 1.42/1.44. is PESA one with detection range about 400KM. Suddently development was stop due to lake of money. Some of its tech are used in N011M (Bars) witch is instaled in SU-30MKI.
Finaly remember K-172 - range about 400Km.

glad to see that there are still so many supporters of russian tech still alive. i had almost given up on this highly americanized world.

The first thing to be noted is that never believe an american or a brit, especially when it comes to aircraft. The brits claimed that the hawk could pull about 7g, but a high speed sharp turn, as sharp as possible registered only 5.5 on the g-meter, coz 7g was what u can pull only in a highly simulated environment where the conditions are as ideal as it can be.

The same moderation must be applied to the F/A 22. Remember the facts and figures that are made public come from the factory, which has the aircraft loaded into virtual reality - where u can get any environment u like. In practical, those figures are way beyond imposible.

Compare these to Russians who build their craft the old fashioned way using hard copy blueprints and all. The figures u get from them are real world coz the only way to get them is to atcually fly the aircraft. These can even be pushed beyond their limits when the push comes to shove. The hawk would probably break up at 7.01g.